openid It feels good to be able to talk publicly about Yahoo's OpenID support (developer info). :-)

It's been in the works for a while and I was one of the early squeaky wheels poking people to see if we could get on board. You can see the official press release or the story on TechCrunch. But no matter where you read it, this is big news.

Both yahoo.com and flickr.com will act as OpenID 2.0 providers. That means starting soon any Yahoo! or Flickr user can sign in to an OpenID 2.0 enabled site simply using a reference to yahoo.com or flickr.com.

I've been a fan of OpenID for a long time--not just because of it's simplicity but because of the philosophy behind it. It puts more control in the hands of us: the end users. And it's another milestone in Yahoo! opening up more and more. In fact, I wrote about it almost exactly one year ago in The Tipping Point for OpenID.

Who knows. Maybe OAuth support isn't far off?

Oh, and before anyone jumps on me about this not being "full" (meaning bi-directional) OpenID support, I'm quite aware of that. Consuming OpenID is a different beast that can't happen overnight. Give it some time. I'm optimistic that we'll get there.

Posted by jzawodn at January 17, 2008 10:02 AM

Reader Comments
# Brad Fitzpatrick said:

Wonderful!

on January 17, 2008 10:29 AM
# Brad Fitzpatrick said:

Your blog should support OpenID commenting, btw. Then you can whitelist certain posters so they don't need to be moderated every time.

on January 17, 2008 10:30 AM
# Baher said:

It's great news, and thanks to you and everyone at Yahoo that contributed to this decision, this announcement is a milestone for Yahoo and OpenID, and will help bring OpenID to its rightful place.

I've wrote about it as well http://technozzle.com/?p=49

on January 17, 2008 10:50 AM
# SexySEO said:

Congrats! It's great news :D

on January 17, 2008 11:25 AM
# Krish said:

Amen to Brad. You should add OpenID support in your blog.

on January 17, 2008 12:03 PM
# Alan said:

I think it's sort of a bummer that full support was not included. If everybody only published there accounts as openids and nobody let people login, it would be pointless. Openid would not be viable if everybody implemented it like yahoo, but I guess this is a start, hopefully yahoo soon is doing full two way

on January 17, 2008 12:37 PM
# Jeremy Zawodny said:

OpenID support here is in the TODO pile.

on January 17, 2008 02:05 PM
# Bryan Field-Elliot said:

This is fantastic news!

on January 17, 2008 02:59 PM
# atom said:

Jeremy, it's time that we OpenID enable your blog!

on January 17, 2008 10:38 PM
# Shreyas Doshi said:

@Alan - yeah, accepting OpenID logins on Yahoo! would certainly be useful and interesting. That said, we think we can provide the most value to the OpenID technology right now by allowing a large chunk of the web's user base (ours) to use this standard in a way that is easier to understand. Hence, our foray as an OpenID Provider. Hopefully, our efforts here will spur the entry of a whole new set of OpenID Relying Parties, especially ones that have been interested in OpenID but have been waiting for it to go prime time.

on January 17, 2008 10:51 PM
# Travis said:

Unfortunately, the MS buyout offer sullies the possibilities of Yahoo as an OpenID source.

I want MS to have as little info about me as I can manage.

Beyond that, if MS were to acquire Yahoo, could OpenID at Yahoo survive? MS is historically hostile to open solutions that don't require a MS-tax, and MS has their own Passport/Wallet thing that they want everyone to use, don't they?

on February 5, 2008 10:25 AM
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are mine and mine alone. My current, past, or previous employers are not responsible for what I write here, the comments left by others, or the photos I may share. If you have questions, please contact me. Also, I am not a journalist or reporter. Don't "pitch" me.

 

Privacy: I do not share or publish the email addresses or IP addresses of anyone posting a comment here without consent. However, I do reserve the right to remove comments that are spammy, off-topic, or otherwise unsuitable based on my comment policy. In a few cases, I may leave spammy comments but remove any URLs they contain.