Sometimes a picture really is worth 1,000 words.

Or laughs.

This image was passed around at work but is legit. It comes from the FEMA web site. However, without the surrounding context, it appears to say the following:

  • Disaster leads to a Response
  • Response leads to Recovery
  • Recovery leads to Mitigation
  • Mitigation leads to Risk Reduction
  • Risk Reduction leads to Prevention
  • Prevention leads to Preparedness
  • Preparedness lead to DISASTER!

I wonder if that graphic artist was trying to be funny or scary. Or both.

Posted by jzawodn at October 25, 2005 11:33 AM

Reader Comments
# anon said:

yes yes, it was on the daily show like a month ago?

on October 25, 2005 12:31 PM
# Joe Zawodny said:

And you wonder why they can't preposition supplies in anticipation or get unused mobile housing moved relatively short distances to where they are needed. They can't even manage a simple message like this one. This is sad. I can see no other way to interpret this figure. Way to go FEMA.

on October 25, 2005 12:38 PM
# Mike said:

Looks like it's a vicious circle too.

on October 25, 2005 12:42 PM
# Sandi said:

I'm having recollections of that ready.gov mess after 9/11, and I still think Michael Jackson is a terrorist!

on October 25, 2005 01:14 PM
# John said:

Joking aside, this actually seems right to me. FEMA is designed for no other purpose than to handle disasters... Being 'prepared' prior to the disaster is the point.

on October 25, 2005 01:36 PM
# Dimitar Vesselinov said:
on October 25, 2005 02:16 PM
# billg said:

Remember the three month's worth of housing money FEMA promised people displaced by Katrina? Well, here (North Carolina) a lot of them haven't received it and are about to be booted out of their apartments, motels, whatever. Why?

Because FEMA mailed their checks to their addresses in New Orleans.

Amazing.

on October 25, 2005 02:42 PM
# dan isaacs said:

Yeah Z, you really need to start watching the Daily Show. :)

on October 25, 2005 03:08 PM
# John said:

Jeez, I watched that Daily Show clip and could barely stand it. It's like "news" for people who graduate from SNL's Weekend Update. Truly puerile and useless.

on October 25, 2005 04:08 PM
# Mike Jackson said:

"Truly puerile and useless" is sort of the point of the Daily Show...

on October 25, 2005 04:19 PM
# R. Kreider said:

Yeah, that is why the show is on comedy central...

on October 25, 2005 04:50 PM
# Andrew Wooster said:

You must not have ever dealt with FEMA before.

After a disaster, they will only give out funds for repairs that go into making things exactly as they were before the disaster.

So, if a road floods, or a house, you have to build it in the exact same location, at the exact same elevation, with the same materials, etc. They don't pay for repairs which may prevent a future disaster from being as bad.

Or, at least, that's been my direct experience.

on October 25, 2005 05:34 PM
# Mike said:

"You must not have ever dealt with FEMA before.

After a disaster, they will only give out funds for repairs that go into making things exactly as they were before the disaster.

So, if a road floods, or a house, you have to build it in the exact same location, at the exact same elevation, with the same materials, etc. They don't pay for repairs which may prevent a future disaster from being as bad.

Or, at least, that's been my direct experience."

So when does the responsibilitiy of to live ABOVE sea-level rest with the resident??? Or, did we all forget what the definition of responsibility is - being that we're so used to instant gratification AND we're all part of the new Generation Blame folks that's emerged recently.

on October 26, 2005 05:22 AM
# RandomLoser said:

It's the American way of life to not know how to fix anything remotely complicated.

However, if the fix involves dropping bombs from 35,000 feet in the air, ontop of innocent women and kids then no problem.

Simple solutions for simple people and stuff.

The Americans forgot that not all solutions are fixed by dropping bombs, and the New Orleans affair was a prime example of this theory.

on October 26, 2005 09:36 AM
# billg said:

Mike, I'm not so sure anyone has a responsiblity to anyone else to live above sealevel. Your logic would prohibit people living in floodplains, earthquake zones, most of the southeast and a good chunk of the northeast (hurricanes), and almost everything west of Colorado (tornados).

While we all need to accept our personal responsibility for events within our ability to prevent, transfering responsbility for the impact of natural disasters entirely to the victims of those disasters -- on the grounds that they should have known they were living in an area subject to disaster --strikes me as deliberate evasion of the bonds of social responsiblility that link us all together. Unless, of course, you're really denying your own responsibllity for the wellbeing of anyone but yourself.


on October 26, 2005 03:53 PM
# RandomWinner said:

RandomLoser - be sure to post your address and country here.

on October 26, 2005 07:33 PM
# Patrick Mullen said:

There is plenty of blame to go around in the Katrina debacle, and that does not diminish the effect of Brown's ineptitude.

The unfortunate reality is that most of us do not visualize responding to a disaster event until it happens. Obviously Brown, Louisiana Gov. Kathleen Blanco, and New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin did not visualize much until well after the hurricane hit (poor or missing communications links may have played a role in this). This phenomenon is sometimes called the "horizon effect."

Evidently, worst case scenarios must be considered before implementing any disaster response, and effective command and control mechanisms must be used. This is probably why the response from the military during Katrina was so well implemented. Military, law enforcement, and firefighting officers usually think in terms of worst case scenarios because these are usually what they confront. Few political leaders have the skills required to deal with these types of situations, probably because the electorate chooses them based on their popular appeal, and not necessarily their actual ability to lead under adversity.

"It is deeply troubling that ---- 20 years after Chernobyl, 11 years after the Northridge quake, two years after the Paradise Fire ---- our leaders are mostly just talking about disaster preparedness." (North County Times, Oct. 18, 2005)

For a further discussion see URL: http://california_now.blogspot.com/

on October 28, 2005 06:29 AM
# Mike said:

They haven't changed the graphic yet? Somebody in your government should start reading blogs. ;)

on November 6, 2005 11:55 PM
# Larry said:

Obviously this is a late response to this blog but seemingly still relevant since a search for something related pulled it up.
The EM cycle is a good graphic and any dipstick can decipher it how they want.... in reality, it works. I ta takes any past function or event and learns from it. I am sure the original post person only intended to point out a pun or "neeto" interpretation of an obvious graphic.
Point is... Don't forget we are a collection of states. Local EM and state Governors HAVE TO REQUEST resources from the federal EM (FEMA).
The fault in my opinion rests on the dipsticks voted in as Mayor (New Orleans) and Governors(LA.).... in this (Katrina)particular occasion.
Whine all you want ..... but individuals also have a responsibility to prepare a bit.... jeez... the grasshopper and ant story.... noone get that anymore?

on March 8, 2009 12:37 PM
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are mine and mine alone. My current, past, or previous employers are not responsible for what I write here, the comments left by others, or the photos I may share. If you have questions, please contact me. Also, I am not a journalist or reporter. Don't "pitch" me.

 

Privacy: I do not share or publish the email addresses or IP addresses of anyone posting a comment here without consent. However, I do reserve the right to remove comments that are spammy, off-topic, or otherwise unsuitable based on my comment policy. In a few cases, I may leave spammy comments but remove any URLs they contain.