On Saturday, September 6th (after my Duo Discus flights the day before), I headed down to South Lake Tahoe Airport to meet up with some BASA guys and test fly the DG-1000 based there giving rides. BASA is considering a DG-1000 purchase and wanted to get some members to test fly one again.

BTW, I took a bunch of excellent pictures on the drive from the north end of Lake Tahoe to the south end.

I was the newest pilot to fly the DG-100. What follows is the flight report I sent to Harry Fox, BASA's president. We were all asked to submit one after our flights.

I had an annoying headache the day I flew but have since had a chance
now to review my flight more clearly.  When I flew with Charlie in the
DG-1000, he flew the takeoff and first 500 feet or so of the tow.  We
had quite a bit of slack early on but by the time I got the controls
things were a bit calmer.  I found it easy to fly on tow.  It didn't
seem much more difficult to control that the Grob or an ASK-21.  I was
careful not to over-control it, so having thought about it in advance
may have been all that was necessary to prevent me from doing it.

Off tow (in lift) I got a chance to thermal up over Heavenly before we
did a stall, turning stall, and an incipient spin.  Thermalling was
relatively easy.  I had to keep turning the glider into the thermal as
it tried to kick us out.  But I attribute that mainly to my lack of
experience in stronger thermals.  Speed control in the thermal was
easier than in the Grob.  In the Grobs, I have trouble flying slowly
enough when there are two of us in the ship.  I had no such problem in
the DG-1000.  And, having flown the Duo Discus the day before for 3+
hours, I found the DG-1000's speed control a bit easier while
thermalling.

After a bit of that, we finally brought the gear up.  I don't think
Charlie helped with that.  The gear was no harder to raise and lock
than that of the Duo (the only other retractable gear ship I've
flown).  In fact, it seemed to require less effort than the Duo's.

The stall was so graceful that Charlie had to tell me that we were
actually stalled the first time.  I expected it to be more obvious and
was waiting to really notice it when he told me.  There was very
little buffeting.  Knowing what to expect, the next stall and the
turning stall were fine.  The ship didn't drop a wing and recovery was
easy.

The incipient spin surprised me.  The nose dropped quite far and the
glider picked up speed very quickly.  Even so, we never flew faster
than 85 knots during the recovery, but compared to the 2-32 (where all
my spin experience comes from) it seemed like a lot.  It was a bit
disorienting too.

After that, Charlie let me do whatever I wanted to, so I flew straight
and level, shallow turns, and practiced speed/pitch control and played
with the trim.  Nothing fancy.  In my flight, I never really got a
good feel for the trim.  I used it but just felt like it wasn't quite
doing what I'd expect.

Other things I noticed...

It's quite quiet inside.  Very easy to talk compared to the Grobs.
Like the Duo, the glider will pick up speed very quickly and bleed it
off very slowly.  Turn coordination was easy.  Much easier than the
Grobs.  And the ailerons were heavy, but not nearly as bad as I
expected.

When it was time to land, I lowered the gear and got us in the
pattern.  The gear was pretty easy to get down and locked, *but* it
took me about 5 tries fumbling with the handle to get an initial grip
on it so I could rotate and move it.  I wouldn't want to be rushed
doing that.  On downwind, Charlie noticed that I hadn't tested the
spoilers.  In retrospect, I think my brain confused my hassle with
getting the gear down with a spoiler check.  Doh!

When I did, the gear alarm went off.  Charlie asked me if I heard it
and what it was.  I said it was the gear alarm and that it didn't make
sense because I had opened and locked the gear.  I was sure of that.
He told me that he purposely unlocked the gear when I was busy doing
other things just to demonstrate the gear alarm.  With that, I was
glad for the gear alarm!

The only other noticeable difference in landing was the effect of the
spoilers.  Unlike the Grob (but *like* the 2-32 or 1-34), the spoilers
to require a more nose-down attitude to maintain airspeed.  The
resulting attitude was a bit lower that I'd have expected.

That's it for the flight.

I mentioned that I didn't think it'd require much more time to learn
compared to the Grob but it would require an emphasis on different
things.  Having thought about that and my transition to the Grob from
the 2-32 and ASK-21, I think they are:

  1. Pitch and trim control.  The DG-1000 is a slick ship and will go
     fast quietly, so there's a lot less audio feedback if you're
     flying too quickly.  In the 2-23 and even the ASK-21, I relied on
     that more than I realized.  (The previous day's flight in the Duo
     helped me to unlearn some of that.)  This affects not only
     "normal" flight, but probably landing too.  Speed control is
     obviously very important then because it's easier to become
     distracted.

  2. Another result of being slick is that it'd probably easier to get
     out of tow position and/or to get slack line.  In the mountains
     that's expected, but it could happen pretty easily at Hollister,
     I'd guess.  Imagine towing behind the Citabria.

  3. Tail/nose weights.  I didn't think to ask about this that day,
     but Charlie did move the weights from the tail to the nose when
     he flew with Johnathon.  When installed up front, the weights are
     well hidden.  I'd want to better understand the weight & balance
     for the ship and make very sure I checked the nose and tail
     during pre-flight and than again before takeoff.

     I did watch him remove the tail weights.  He showed me how to
     unlock and remove the little pole that holds the weights and then
     reinstall and lock it.  It seemed pretty simple.

Physically, I was quite comfortable with a parachute on.  It's the
most comfortable ship I've flown.  I found the controls easy to use
except for the initial grab to get the gear back down.  Visibility was
excellent.  The extra cockpit room compared to the Duo is great.  My
only real complaint is the poor placement of the pouch mounted on the
right side.  It was about 6-8 inches too far back.  I mentioned this
to Charlie and he suggest that it probably wouldn't be hard to
relocate.

As for me, I'm roughly 6 feet tall and weigh about 205lbs.

Oh, the rudder control was a little funky because of the shoes I wore.
They felt like they got caught a few times on the upholstery.  That's
easily solved by wearing different shoes, of course.

Finally, I'm posting all the pictures I took that day:

  http://jeremy.zawodny.com/pics/dg1000/

That's it...

Posted by jzawodn at October 02, 2003 08:15 PM

Reader Comments
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are mine and mine alone. My current, past, or previous employers are not responsible for what I write here, the comments left by others, or the photos I may share. If you have questions, please contact me. Also, I am not a journalist or reporter. Don't "pitch" me.

 

Privacy: I do not share or publish the email addresses or IP addresses of anyone posting a comment here without consent. However, I do reserve the right to remove comments that are spammy, off-topic, or otherwise unsuitable based on my comment policy. In a few cases, I may leave spammy comments but remove any URLs they contain.